Impulse and Momentum
Having studied the macroscopic movement of a
system of particles, we now turn to the microscopic movement: the movement of
individual particles in the system. This movement is determined by forces
applied to each particle by the other particles. We shall examine how these
forces change the motion of the particles, and generate our second great law of
conservation, the conservation of linear momentum.
Impulse
Often in systems of particles, two particles
interact by applying a force to each other over a finite period of time, as in
a collision. The physics of collisions will be further examined in the next SparkNote as an extension
of our conservation law, but for now we will look at the general case of forces
acting over a period of time. We shall define this concept, force applied over
a time period, as impulse. Impulse can be defined mathematically, and is
denoted by J :
J = FΔt
|
|
Just as work was a
force over a distance, impulse is force over a time. Work applied mostly to
forces that would be considered external in a system of particles: gravity,
spring force, friction. Impulse, however, applies mostly to interactions finite
in time, best seen in particle interactions. A good example of impulse is the
action of hitting a ball with a bat. Though the contact may seem instantaneous,
there actually is a short period of time in which the bat exerts a force on the
ball. The impulse in this situation is the average force exerted by the bat
multiplied by the time the bat and ball were in contact. It is also important
to note that impulse is a vector quantity, pointing in the same direction as
the force applied.
Given the situation of hitting a ball, can we
predict the resultant motion of the ball? Let us analyze our equation for
impulse more closely, and convert it to a kinematic expression. We first
substitute F = ma into our equation:
J = FΔt = (ma)Δt
But the acceleration
can also be expressed as a =
. Thus:
J = m
Δt = mΔv = Δ(mv)
= mv f - mv o
The large impulse
applied by the bat actually reverses the direction of the ball, causing a large
change in velocity.
Recall that when
finding that work caused a change in the quantity
mv 2 we defined this as
kinetic energy. Similarly, we define momentum according to our equation for an
impulse.
Momentum
From our equation relating impulse and
velocity, it is logical to define the momentum of a single particle, denoted by
the vector p , as such:
p = mv
|
|
Again, momentum is a
vector quantity, pointing in the direction of the velocity of the object. From
this definition we can generate two every important equations, the first
relating force and acceleration, the second relating impulse and momentum.
Equation 1: Relating
Force and Acceleration
The first equation, involving calculus,
reverts back to Newton's Laws. If we take a time derivative of our momentum
expression we get the following equation:
Thus
|
|
It is this equation,
not F = ma that Newton originally used to
relate force and acceleration. Though in classical mechanics the two equations
are equivalent, one finds in relativity that only the equation involving
momentum is valid, as mass becomes a variable quantity. Though this equation is
not essential for classical mechanics, it becomes quite useful in higher-level
physics.
Equation 2: The Impulse-Momentum Theorem
The second equation we
can generate from our definition of momentum comes from our equations for
impulse. Recall that:
J = mv f - mv o
Substituting
our expression for momentum, we find that:
J = p f - p o = Δp
|
|
This
equation is known as the Impulse-Momentum Theorem. Stated verbally, an impulse
given to a particle causes a change in momentum of that particle. Keeping this
equation in mind, momentum is conceptually quite similar to kinetic energy.
Both quantities are defined based on concepts dealing with force: kinetic
energy is defined by work, and momentum is defined by impulse. Just as a net work
causes a change in kinetic energy, a net impulse causes a change momentum. In
addition, both are related to velocity in some way. In fact, combining the two
equations K =
mv 2 and p = mv we can see that:
K =
|
|
This
simple equation can be quite convenient for relating the two different
concepts.
This section, dealing exclusively with the momentum of a single particle, might seem out of place after a section on systems of particles. However, when we combine the definition of momentum with our knowledge of systems of particles, we can generate a powerful conservation law: the conservation of momentum.
This section, dealing exclusively with the momentum of a single particle, might seem out of place after a section on systems of particles. However, when we combine the definition of momentum with our knowledge of systems of particles, we can generate a powerful conservation law: the conservation of momentum.
Social Plugin