NATIONALISM
AS A CAUSE OF WORLD WAR I
Nationalism was a
significant cause of World War I. In the years prior to war, many Europeans
nurtured a firm belief in the cultural, economic and military supremacy of
their nation. This arrogance and overconfidence was fuelled by the jingoistic
press. The pages of newspapers were often packed with nationalist rhetoric,
inflammatory stories about rival nations and other forms of sabre rattling.
Nationalism was also reflected in other aspects of popular culture, including
literature, music and theatre. Royals, politicians and diplomats did little to
deflate nationalism – and some actively contributed to it with their own
provocative remarks and rhetoric. Nationalism assured citizens of the moral
rectitude of their nation, suggesting that it was fair, righteous and without
blame. In contrast it demonised rival nations, caricaturing them as aggressive,
scheming, deceitful, backward or uncivilised. It convinced many Europeans that
their nation was threatened by the expansionist plotting of its rivals. It
assured them that in the event of a war, their nation would emerge victorious.
In concert with its brothers, imperialism and militarism, nationalism created a
mass delusion that a European war was both winnable and necessary.
Europe’s failure to
recognise the perils of war is to some extent explainable. Aside from the
Crimean War (1853-56) and the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71), the 1800s was a
century of comparative peace for the continent. In England, France and Germany,
the public had become accustomed to a regular diet of brief and victorious
colonial wars, fought against undeveloped and under-equipped opponents in far
away places. With the exception of France, beaten by the Prussians in 1871,
none of Europe’s Great Powers had tasted significant military defeat for more
than half a century. On this indifference to war, the arms race and the
development of new military technology built a growing delusion of
invincibility. Britons believed that their naval power, backed by the economic
might of the empire, would protect their island and give them the upper hand in
any war. The Germans placed great faith in Prussian military prestige and
efficiency, in their policy of armament and their growing fleet of battleships
and U-boats (submarines). The German high command had supreme confidence in its
Schlieffen Plan, a pre-emptive military strategy for winning a two-front war
against both France and Russia. In Russia itself, tsar believed his throne and
empire were protected by God – and by Russia’s massive army of 1.5 million men,
the largest peacetime land force in Europe. The French placed their faith in a
wall of concrete fortresses and defences, running the length of their eastern
border and capable of withstanding any German attack.
Stories and stereotypes
Underpinning these
practical measures was an near spiritual belief in the strength and
righteousness of each nation. By the late 1800s some European powers were
almost drunk with patriotism and nationalism, though not without some cause.
Britain, for instance, had enjoyed two centuries of imperial, commercial and
naval dominance, her empire spanning one quarter of the globe. The lyrics of a
popular patriotic song, Rule, Britannia!, trumpeted that “Britons never
never will be slaves”. London had spent much of the 19th century advancing her
imperial and commercial interests and avoiding wars – however the unification
of Germany, the speed of German armament and the bellicosity of Kaiser Wilhelm
II gave many Britons cause for concern. Britain’s ‘penny press’ (serialised
novels and short stories) fuelled foreign rivalries with incredible fictions
about foreign intrigue, espionage, future war and invasion. The Battle
of Dorking (1871), to cite one example, was a wild tale about a
successful invasion of England by German forces. By 1910 a Londoner could buy
dozens of tawdry examples of ‘invasion literature’, each gamely warning of
German, Russian or French aggression or under-handedness, perpetrated against
England or her interests. This invasion literature was often marked by racial
stereotyping or innuendo: the German was painted as cold, cruel and
calculating, the Russian an uncultured barbarian, the Frenchman a
leisure-seeking layabout, the Chinese a race of murderous savages. Penny
novelists, cartoonists and satirists mocked the rulers of these countries. Two
of the most popular targets were the German kaiser and the Russian tsar, both
ridiculed for their arrogance, excessive ambition or megalomania.
“The first month of the
war resembled a month-long patriotic festival. In the first three weeks of
August, Germans said goodbye to their troops, smothering them with flowers and
so much chocolate that the Red Cross asked the people to be less generous: the
soldiers were getting sick… The national flag flew everywhere, even in the
courtyards of Berlin’s working-class apartment houses, where it had never been
seen before. Journalists, politicians and government officials contributed to
this aura by employing a religious vocabulary… the ‘war enthusiasm’ was a ‘holy
moment’, a ‘holy flame of anger’, ‘heroic’, a ‘revelation'; it had brought
forth a ‘rebirth through war’.”
Jeffrey Verhey, historian
Jeffrey Verhey, historian
German attitudes were
just as intense, though they sprang from different origins. The German nation
was comparatively young, formed by the unification of 26 German-speaking states
or territories in 1871. German nationalism was the political glue that bound
together these disparate states: Prussia, Bavaria, Saxony, Hesse, Baden, Brunswick
and others. The leaders of post-1871 Germany relied on nationalism to
consolidate and strengthen the new nation. German culture – from the poetry of
Goethe to the music of Richard Wagner – was promoted and celebrated. German
nationalism also went hand in glove with German militarism: the state of the
nation was both defined and reflected by the strength of its military forces.
The new kaiser, Wilhelm II, was the personification of this new Germany. Both
the kaiser and his nation were young, nationalistic, obsessed with military
power and imperial expansion; proud of Germany’s achievements but nervous about
its future; envious of other powers and desperate for national success. In the
kaiser’s mind, the main obstacle to German expansion was Britain. Wilhelm
envied Britain’s vast empire and enormous naval power but considered them
greedy and hypocritical: the British retained the world’s largest empire but
maneuvered against German colonial acquisitions in Africa, Asia and elsewhere.
Britain became a popular target in the pre-war German press, particularly
during the Boer War of 1899-1902, Britain’s heavy-handed war against white
farmer-settlers in South Africa. Berlin went as far as secretly supplying the
anti-British Boers with weapons and munitions.
The quest for
independence
As the Great Powers
thumped their chests and trumpeted their own superiority, another dangerous
form of nationalism was on the rise in southern Europe. This nationalism was
not about supremacy or military power – but the right to independence, self
determination and self government. With the world divided into empires and
spheres of influence, different regions, races and religions sought freedom
from their imperial masters. In Russia, more than 80 ethnic groups were forced
to speak the Russian language, worship the Russian tsar and practice the
Russian Orthodox religion. For much of the 19th century China had been ‘carved
up’ and economically exploited by European powers; resentful Chinese formed
secret and exiled nationalist groups to rid their country of foreign influence.
Nationalist groups contributed to the weakening of the Ottoman Empire in
eastern Europe, striving to throw off Muslim rule. The growth of Slavic
nationalist groups in the Balkans threatened the stability of the fragile
Austro-Hungarian Empire. Aggravated by Vienna’s annexation of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, young Serbs joined radical nationalist groups like the ‘Black
Hand’ (Crna Ruka). These groups hoped to drive Austria-Hungary from the
Balkans and establish a ‘Greater Serbia’, a unified state for all Slavic
people. It was this pan-Slavic nationalism that inspired the assassination of
Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in June 1914, an event that lit the touch
paper of World War I.
REFERENCE
http://alphahistory.com/worldwar1/nationalism/#sthash.SWVO6bUv.dpuf
Social Plugin