MEANING OF MEANING
There
is no specific definition about the meaning of meaning, different scholars
tries to define this term on how they think, feel into their mind. The
following are definitions of meaning of meaning.
According
to Ogden and Richards (1923) says meaning of meaning as we use word “mean”
refers to express our intention. Example the red signal means stop. That is the
way of indicating what the red signal signifies, this means that signs used to
indicate other signs. Instead of this meaning they come to other definition on
how they see the meaning of meaning. Example; says meaning of meaning is the
thing to which the speaker of that word believes himself to be referring. Also
meaning is the thing to which the hearer of those words believes is being
referred.
These
scholars continue to say meaning is an intrinsic property of something, when we
say meaning is an intrinsic we mean is a property of a substance that is
independent of the amount of the substance present. This definition refers to
many different ways in which meaning is understood.
According
to Pushpinder (2011), defines meaning by thinking the relationship between
words and the objects which word represent. Example we may ask what is the
meaning of a word “cow”. This may refer to an animal who has a certain
properties distinguished from other animals, that this animal has four legs.
Due
to this idea we can say that the meaning of the word is related or stand for
the actual objects but there are meaning of a word is not refers to the object
refer to, for example the word “love” that exist in the mind.
According
to Simon (1995), defines meaning as it involved drawing on a memory contents.
This helps the clarification if word like “content” is clear than “meaning”.
Meaning comes from the intention of people. So intentions are fundamental than
meaning if not we need an account of how intentions flow from meanings perhaps
“intention”= “meanings” because “intentions”= “content” if intentions are more
fundamental than it is not clear why this is a cognitive science theory,
because intention is used in the broad
sense in which this term is used in the contemporary philosophy. This meaning
is seems to be appeal to criteria of identity and similarity that are
independent of what is going on in people’s heads which often absorbed in
creating multiple meaning.
According
to Babito (1984) says meaning of meaning is the term that has different
connotations according to context. This means the term meaning could connotate
something to which the speaker believes to be referring to. Example the
sentence “He is a woman”, the word woman has been used connotatively either to
mean weak or kind, continue to say meaning can be defined in terms of entires in the dictionary
whether asked the meaning of certain word one consults the dictionary. Meaning
could connotate the practical consequences of anything in our experience.
Example the word “freedom” could connotate differently to a prisoner or a
student or a child at home. These variations supposed to be more careful to
what is really meant by certain expression.
Bloomfield
(1933) says meaning of meaning is a non- physical process, a thought, concept,
image, feeling, act of will that happens inside the speaker preceding the
emission of the form and of language as the expression of the ideas or
feelings. Continues to say the meaning statement is not contained in the
statement itself instead, it is connected to the practical events that precede
and follow it related both to the speaker and to the listener. Speech ulterance
trial and unimportant in itself is important because it has a meaning. The
statement of meaning is therefore the weak point in language study and will
remain so until human knowledge advances very far beyond its present state.
Before
looking the different theories of meaning let see the types of meaning in order
to relate with the previous definitions concerning the meaning of meaning in
order to understand and clarify how the meaning is.
According
to Leech (1974) breaks down meanings into seven types or ingredients giving
primary to conceptual meaning.
Conceptual
or denotative meaning, this is also called logical or cognitive meaning whereby
it is a basic proportional meaning which corresponds to the primary dictionary
definition. This conceptual meaning it has sophisticated organization based on
the principle of contractiveness and hierarchical structure. For example the
word “boy”= “human+ male- adult. So this conceptual meaning is the literal
meaning of the word indicating the idea or concept to which it refers, and the
aims of conceptual meaning is to provide an appropriate semantic representation
to a sentence and to distinguish one meaning from the meaning of other
sentence. In communication to be understood they depend on conceptual meaning.
Social
meaning, this is a type of meaning whereby the meaning is conveyed by the piece
of language about the social context of its uses. This social meaning is related
to the situation in which ulterance is used. For example some dialectic words
inform us about the regional and social background of the speaker so according
to the certain place the speaker and the listener have their different style
that uses in their communication. For example “come on yaar, be a sport. Don’t
be lallu”. The social meaning can be that.
Connotative
meaning, this is among types of meaning whereby it is a communicative value of
an expression over and above its purely conceptual content. It is something
that goes beyond mere referent of a word and hits at its attributes in the real
world. This conceptual meaning it is something more than the dictionary
meaning. Sometimes connotation vary age to age and society to society. For
example old age “woman” non-trouser wearing or sari wearing In Indian context
must have seemed definite connotation in the past. Present “woman” sari wear/
T-shirt/Jeans wearing. Also connotation varies from person to person.
For
example connotation of the word “woman” for misogyrust and a person of feminist
vary. So connotative meaning is regarded as incidental comparatively unstable
in determinant open ended variable according to age, culture and individual.
Affective
or emotive meaning, this meaning for some linguists refers to the emotive
association or effects of words evoked in the reader, listener. This is what is
conveyed about the personal feelings or attitude towards the listener, for
example “home” for a soldier or expatriate and “mother” for a motherless child,
a married woman. Affective meaning refers to what is conveyed about the feeling
and attitude of the speaker through use of language means that attitude to
listener as well as attitude to what he is saying. And this meaning is often
conveyed through conceptual, connotative content of the words used, example of
the sentence “you are a vicious tyrant and a villainous reprobation and I hate
you”. This sentence is a little doubt about the speaker feelings towards the
listener, here speaker seems to have a very negative attitude towards his
listener, and this is called affective meaning.
Reflected
meaning; this also is the type of meaning whereby reflected meaning and
collocative meaning involve interconnection. At lexical level reflected meaning
arises when a word has more than one conceptual meaning or multiple conceptual
meaning.
Leech
continues to argue that in church service “the comforter and the Holy Ghost”
refers to the third in trinity. They are religious words but unconsciously
there is a response to their nonreligious meaning too. Thus a Ghost is more
frequent and familiar in no religious sense. So reflected meaning has great
importance in the study of semantics.
Collocative
meaning is the meaning which a word acquires in the company of certain words.
Collocative meaning refers to the association of a word because of its usual or
habitual co-occurrence with certain types of words. For example “pretty and
handsome” indicate good looking; however they slightly differ from each other
because of collocation or co-occurrence. The word “pretty” locates with girls,
woman, village, gardens, and flowers but on the other hand the word “handsome”
collocates with boys, men and so on. Collocative meaning need to be evoked only
when other categories of meaning don’t apply. Generalization can be made in
case of other meanings while coollocative is simply on idiosyncratic property
of individual words. So collocative meaning has its importance and it is a
marginal kind of category.
The
last type of meaning is themantic meaning; this meaning refers to what is
communicated by the way in which a speaker or a writer organizes the message in
terms of ordering focus and emphasis.
Thus
active is different from passive though its conceptual meaning is the same, so
themantic meaning helps us to understand the message and its applications
properly. For example the following statements in active and passive voice have
the same conceptual meaning but different communicative values, for example:
Mrs.
Smith donated the first prize
The
first prize was donated by Mrs. Smith.
In
the first sentence who gave away the prize is more important but in the second
sentence “what did Mrs. Smith gave is important”. Thus the change of focus
change the meaning also. So the way we order our message also convey what is
important and what not, this is basically themantic meaning.
So
we need to know that meaning plays a virtual role in understanding what is
communicated, then according to this scholar there are seven types of meaning
and they contributed much to the field of semantics, the study of meaning is
the new field of this country, in days to come, this field of study will
progress and will have much value in analysis of meaning in field of
linguistics.
In
order to understand better the meaning of meaning let us see the different
theories concerning the meaning of meaning and how this theory contributed much
in the understanding of the term meaning of meaning.
According
to Richards coined the meaning of meaning theory was the study of
misunderstanding and its remedies (Griffen, 1997:57). This new rhetoric focused
on understanding rather than persuasion which is what most of the old rhetoric
focused on. He felt that understanding is the main goal of communication and
communication problems result from misunderstanding and this information that
was lost during a conversation was due to people’s language.
One
of the ideas of meaning of meaning theory is the “proper meaning superstition”.
Richards says that the proper meaning superstition is false because words mean
different thing to different people in different situations. So this misunderstanding
can cause confusion because people think that they are talking about the same
thing but really they are not.
Another
theory is that the idea of signs is something that we directly encounter, but
at the same time it refers to something else (Griffen, 1997:58) example the
sign or word of smoke is a sign of a fire. And we mean that words are a
different kind of sign called a symbol. Symbols have no natural connection with
the things that they described (Griffen,1997: 58).
The
only reason that words are symbols of something is because they have been given
meaning thus may cause problems when people are communicating using arbitrary
words that do not have an exact meaning.
The
meaning of meaning theory, this theory main idea is that meanings don’t reside
in words, they reside in people. Understanding that meaning comes from
individual, people can help to clear up confusion and prevent arguments when
communicating with others since people interpret words and phrases differently.
The
meaning of meaning theory has both scientific and human perspectives. Richards
puts the theory into words and concepts that are easy to understand this theory
has practical application in our daily life because it shows us ways to clear
us misunderstandings that communication confusion may have created, so this
theory it gives us the solutions for ways to fix the problem.
Richards
theory has a lot of good ideas to take away from it. He reminds us that meaning
do not reside in words, they reside in people (Ogden, 1923:247). Although we
must bring other aspects such as non verbal and the reason that people say,
what they say into consideration.
Not
only the good idea of this theory but also there is the problem with this
theory that simply understanding meaning does not give the whole understanding
of the word unless it is in context.
Looking
at the definition of meaning of meaning, types of meaning and also the theory
of meaning, it is suggested that meaning of meaning is not reside in words but
they reside in people’s mind. Thus means the meaning of something can be
explained on how the person has been understood according to the situation or
certain area.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.
Bloom
field, L (1970) Philosophical Aspects of Language,
Indian University Press, India.
Griffen,
E. M (1997) A First Look at Communication
Theory, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; New York.
Jindal,
P. S. (2011) Introduction to Linguistics,
Oxford University Press, New York.
Leech,
G and Startvik, J. A (1975) A
Communicative Grammar of English, Longman Group Ltd, London.
Leech,
G et al (2004) A Communication Grammar of
English Person Education;
Singapore, ple Ltd.
Ogden,
C. K (1923) The Meaning of Meaning,
Harcourt Brace and World Inc, New York.
Richard,
A and Ogden, K. C (1989) The Meaning of
Meaning Harvest/hes, New York.
Www.
Stanford.edu/group/shr/4-1/text/van brankal.commentary-html.
Social Plugin